UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

(Rule 14a-101)

SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION STATEMENT

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934

(Amendment No. )

Filed by the Registrant ☒

Filed by a Party other than the Registrant ☐

Check the appropriate box:

FARMERSFarmers & MERCHANTS BANCORP, INC.

Merchants Bancorp

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box)all boxes that apply):

March 15, 2018

Dear Fellow Shareholders:

I am pleased to invite you to attend the Annual Meeting of Shareholders of Farmers & Merchants Bancorp, Inc. The meeting will be held at Founders Hall, located at Sauder Village, 22611 State Route 2, Archbold, Ohio 43502 onThursday, April 19, 2018 at 7:00 P.M. (local time).The sit down dinner will begin at 6:00 P.M.

There are two proposals scheduled to be voted on at the meeting which includes the election of members to serve on the Company Board of Directors and an advisory vote on the selection of our independent registered accounting firm, which gives you the opportunity to endorse or not endorse the Company’s appointment of the independent registered public accounting firm.

YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT NO MATTER HOW MANY SHARES YOU OWN.I encourage you to read the proxy statement carefully and then to vote your shares. If you choose not to attend the Annual Meeting of Shareholders, you may vote by mail by signing, dating and returning the proxy card in the accompanying envelope. If you hold shares of Farmers & Merchants Bancorp, Inc. common stock directly in your name, you may also vote over the internet or by telephone. Internet and telephone voting instructions are printed on the proxy card sent to you.

If you do attend the meeting and desire to vote in person, you may do so even though you have previously submitted your proxy. In that case, your vote at the meeting would supersede your proxy. Please keep in mind that if you vote your shares at the Annual Meeting,you must bring your Proxy Card Control Number and proof of identity.

We look forward to seeing you at the meeting.

Sincerely,

Paul S. Siebenmorgen, President and CEO

Farmers & Merchants Bancorp, Inc.

P.O. Box 216     307 North Defiance St.,     Archbold, Ohio 43502    Phone (419) 446-2501

FARMERS & MERCHANTS BANCORP, INC.

307 North Defiance St.

Archbold, Ohio 43502

(419) 446-2501

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

TO BE HELD

April 19, 2018 APRIL 29, 2024

To Our Shareholders:

Notice Is Hereby GivenNOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Annual Meeting of Shareholders of Farmers & Merchants Bancorp, Inc., an Ohio corporation (the “Company”), will be held virtually on April 29, 2024, at Founders Hall, located at Sauder Village, 22611 State Route 2, Archbold, Ohio 43502 onThursday,April 19, 2018 at 7:001:30 P.M. (local time), Eastern Daylight Savings Time, for the following purposes:

This year, the Annual Meeting will be hosted as a completely virtual meeting of shareholders, which will be conducted solely online via live webcast. Shareholders will be able to participate in the Annual Meeting online, vote your shares electronically and submit questions prior and during the Annual Meeting by visiting www.meetnow.global/MF5TPAG at the meeting date and time described in the accompanying proxy statement. There is no physical location for the Annual Meeting. The Board of Directors has fixed the close of business on February 28, 2018March 5, 2024 as the voting record date for determination of shareholders who are entitled to notice of and to vote at the meeting.Annual Meeting.

By Order of the Board of Directors

Lydia A. Huber

Melinda L. Gies Board Administrator/Corporate Secretary

Archbold, Ohio

March 15, 2018

March 15, 2024

Archbold, Ohio

IfPROXY STATEMENT

FARMERS & MERCHANTS BANCORP, INC.

307 North Defiance Street

Archbold, Ohio 43502

2024 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

April 29, 2024

GENERAL INFORMATION

This Proxy Statement is being furnished in connection with the enclosed proxy statement and annual report are being delivered to two or more security holders who sharesolicitation of proxies by the same address, and the security holders sharing the same address each desires to receive a proxy statement and annual report, or if there is more than one copyBoard of the proxy statement and annual report being delivered to security holders who share the same address, and it is preferred to receive a single copy of such proxy statement and annual report, please notify Ms. Lydia A. Huber, Corporate SecretaryDirectors of Farmers & Merchants Bancorp, Inc., an Ohio corporation (“Company”), to be used at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders of the Company, to be held on Monday, April 29, 2024, at 1:30 PM EST, and at any adjournment thereof, for the purposes set forth in the Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders. This year’s Annual Meeting will be hosted as a completely virtual meeting, which will be conducted solely online via live webcast at www.meetnow.global/MF5TPAG. Shareholders will be able to participate in the Annual Meeting by accessing online, voting their shares electronically and submitting questions prior to and online during the meeting. To participate in the live webcast of the Annual Meeting, you will need your secure 15-Digit Control Number, which is provided on your proxy card, to enter the meeting.

The Company will send a single annual report, 10-K and proxy statement to multiple shareholders of record that share the same address, unless we receive instructions to the contrary. However, each shareholder of record will continue to receive a separate proxy card. This practice, known as “householding,” is designed to reduce our printing and postage costs. If you wish to receive a separate annual report, 10-K and proxy statement, you may request should be init by writing addressed to Ms. Huberus at Farmers & Merchants Bancorp, Inc., Attention: Investor Relations, 307 North Defiance St.,Street, Archbold, Ohio 43502. If you have questions, pleasewish to discontinue householding entirely, you may contact Ms. HuberInvestor Relations by telephone at 419-446-2501.calling 419-446-2501 or by forwarding a written request addressed to the address above. If you receive multiple copies of the annual report, 10-K and proxy statement, you may request householding by contacting the Company as noted above. If your shares are held in street name through a bank, broker, or other holder of record, you may request householding by contacting that bank, broker, or other holder of record. In addition, the Company also makes available copies of these materials electronically, as described in the section which immediately follows.

YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT

IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS FOR THE SHAREHOLDERS

ANNUAL MEETING TO BE HELD ON APRIL 19, 201829, 2024

The proxy statement and annual report to security holders are available at:

http://www.fm.bank/proxy(FMAO)fm2017/fm_info.cfmwww.envisionreports.com/FMAO

The following items are available at the specified web site:

1

The proxy statement being issued in connection withProxy Statement, Proxy Card and Farmers & Merchants Bancorp, Inc. 2023 Annual Report will be mailed to shareholders commencing on or about March 15, 2024.

VIRTUAL MEETING INFORMATION

We will be hosting the 2018 Annual Meeting of Shareholders;

If you would like to vote your shares in person atelectronically during the meeting:, Please contact Ms. Lydia A. Huber, Corporate Secretaryshareholders of the Company at (419) 446-2501 if you would like information on how to obtain directions to be able to attend the meeting, and voterecord date can participate in person or if you have any additional questions.

The Proxy Statement, Proxy Card and Farmers & Merchants Bancorp, Inc. 2017 Annual Report will be mailed to shareholders commencing on or about March 15, 2018.

1

FARMERS & MERCHANTS BANCORP, INC.

Proxy Statement

for

Annual Meeting of Shareholders

April 19, 2018

This Proxy Statement is furnished in connection with the solicitation of proxies by the Board of Directors of Farmers & Merchants Bancorp, Inc., an Ohio corporation (“Company”), to be used at the Annual Meeting via live webcast and entitled to vote electronically over the internet at www.meetnow.global/MF5TPAG.

In accordance with company policy, proxy cards, ballots and voting instructions that identify individual shareholders will be kept confidential. Exceptions to this policy, however, may be necessary in limited instances to comply with applicable legal requirements and in the event of Shareholdersa contested proxy solicitation, to verify the validity of proxies presented by any person and the results of the Company, to be held at Founders Hall, located at Sauder Village, 22611 State Route 2, Archbold, Ohio 43502 on Thursday, April 19, 2018 at 7:00 P.M. (local time), and at any adjournments thereof, pursuant to the accompanying Notice of Meeting.voting.

General Information about the Meeting and Voting Securities and Procedures

Who may vote at the meeting?MEETING INFORMATION

The Board of Directors has fixed the close of business on February 28, 2018March 5, 2024, as the record date for the determination of shareholders who are entitled to notice of and to vote at the meeting. Subject to your right to vote cumulatively in the election of directors, if properly implemented, you are entitled to one vote for each share of common stock you held on the record date, including shares:

How many shares must be present to hold the meeting?

The Company’s Code of Regulations generally provides that thirty-three and one-third percent (33 1/3%) of the Company’s shares entitled to vote be present in person or by proxy at any meeting shall constitute a quorum for purposes of holding the meeting and conducting business. As of December 31, 2017January 1, 2024, there were 9,265,88013,664,641 shares of the Company’s common stock, without par value (“Common Stock”) outstanding, of which 92,350151,350 shares are subject to restricted stock grants, the holders of which shares are entitled to vote such shares. Each of the holders of the outstanding shares and restricted stock grants totaling 9,265,88013,664,641 shares are entitled to one vote per share, subject to the right to vote cumulatively in the election of directors, if properly implemented.Yourimplemented. Your shares are counted as present at the meeting if you:

Abstentions and broker non-votes are counted for purposes of determining the presence or absence of a quorum for the transaction of business at the meeting.

What proposals will be voted on at the meeting?

There are twothree proposals scheduled to be voted on at the meeting which includeinclude: (i) the election of thirteen members to serve on the Company Board of DirectorsDirectors; (ii) an advisory vote on Say-on-Pay to consider the executive compensation programs of the Company; and (iii) an advisory vote on the selection of our independent registered accounting firm, which gives you the opportunity to endorse or not endorse the Company’s appointment of the independent registered public accounting firm.

Who is requesting my vote?

The solicitation of proxies on the enclosed form is made on behalf of the Board of Directors of the Company and will be conducted primarily through the mail. Please vote by telephone or the internet. Or mail your completed proxy in the envelope included with these proxy materials. In addition to the use of the mail, members of the Board of Directors and certain officers and employees of the Company or its subsidiary may solicit the return of proxies by telephone, facsimile, and other electronic media or through personal contact. The directors, officers and employees that participate in such solicitation will not receive additional compensation for such efforts but will be reimbursed for out-of-pocket expenses. The cost of preparing, assembling, and mailing this Proxy Statement, the Notice of Meeting and the enclosed proxy will be borne by the Company.

23

REQUIRED VOTE

How many votesYou are requiredentitled to approvecast one vote for each proposal?share owned. Below are specifics regarding the vote requirement for each proposal:

Proposal One:

Directors will be elected by a plurality of the votes cast at the Annual Meeting. This means that the tenthirteen nominees who receive the largest number of “FOR” votes cast will be elected as directors.

The laws of Ohio, under which the Company is incorporated, and the Company’s Articles of Incorporation provide that if notice in writing is given by any shareholder to the President, Vice President or the Secretary of the Company not less than 48 hours before the time fixed for holding a meeting of shareholders for the purpose of electing directors, that he desiresthey desire that the voting at that election shall be cumulative, and if an announcement of the giving of such notice is made upon the convening of the meeting by the Chairman or Secretary or by or on behalf of the shareholder giving such notice, each shareholder shall have the right to cumulate such voting power as he possessesthey possess in voting for directors. Cumulative voting rights allow shareholders to vote the number of shares owned by them times the number of directors to be elected and to cast such votes for one nominee or to allocate such votes among nominees as they deem appropriate. Shareholders will not be entitled to exercise cumulative voting unless at least one shareholder properly notifies the Company of their desire to implement cumulative voting at the Annual Meeting. The Company is soliciting the discretionary authority to cumulate votes represented by proxy, if such cumulative voting rights are exercised.

Proposal Two:

Proposal Two, commonly known as a “Say-on-Pay” proposal, gives you as a shareholder the opportunity to endorse or not endorse our executive compensation programs. The affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast by the holders of the Company’s common stock is required to approve Proposal Two, a nonbinding advisory vote on executive compensation.

Proposal Three:

Proposal Three, the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast by the holders of the Company’s common stock is required to approve Proposal Three, a non-binding advisory vote on the appointment of the independent registered public accounting firm.

Because the proposal to approve and ratify the appointment of FORVIS, LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm is advisory, it will not be binding upon the Board. However, the Audit Committee may re-consider its selection of FORVIS, LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2024.

What are the effects of abstentions and broker non-votes on each proposal?

If you hold your shares in a trust or brokerage account (sometimes referred to as holding shares in “street name”) please note that your bank or brokerage firm has no discretionary“no discretionary” voting authority with respect to ProposalProposals One through Two and therefore cannot vote on any of such proposalproposals in the absence of your instructions. As a result, unless you direct your broker on how to vote your shares with respect to Proposal One,those proposals, your shares will remain un-voted on Proposals One and Two. Proposal One. SharesThree is considered a “discretionary” item, so your brokerage firm may vote in its discretion on your behalf if you do not furnish voting instructions.

Furthermore, shares held in street name for which no voting instructions have been provided by the beneficial owner (and which are not voted by the broker pursuant to discretionary voting authority) are generally referred to as “broker non-votes”. Although abstentions and broker non-votes will be counted for purposes of determining the presence of a quorum, they are not considered votes cast. As a consequence, abstentions and broker non-votes will not impact the outcome of either proposal.

Proposal One:

Under Proposal One, Directors4

How can I participate in the Annual Meeting with the ability to ask a question and/or vote?

No physical meeting of shareholders will be electedheld this year. The Annual Meeting will be a completely virtual meeting, which will be conducted exclusively by a pluralitywebcast. You are entitled to participate in the Annual Meeting only if, as of the votes castRecord Date, you were either: (A) a shareholder of record of the Company (a “Record Holder”) holding shares registered in your name; or (B) a “beneficial holder” holding shares through a brokerage or retirement account and have been issued a valid legal proxy to vote your shares by the applicable bank or broker (a “Beneficial Holder”). A Record Holder will receive a form of proxy directly from the Company, while a Beneficial Holder will generally receive a “voting instruction form” from their brokerage or other financial institution requesting direction on how to vote the shares on their behalf.

As a Record Holder, you will be able to participate in the Annual Meeting online, ask a question and vote by visiting www.meetnow.global/MF5TPAG and follow the instructions on your Notice, proxy card, or on the instructions that accompanied your proxy materials.

If you are a Beneficial Holder and want to participate in the Annual Meeting online by webcast with the ability to ask a question and/or vote, if you choose to do so, register to participate in advance of the Annual meeting.

To register in advance of the Annual Meeting, submit proof to Computershare of your legal proxy power from your broker or bank reflecting your holdings along with your name and email address. Requests for advance registration must be labeled as “Legal Proxy” and be received no later than 5:00 PM EST, on April 24, 2024. Requests for advance registration should be directed to us at the following:

For Beneficial Owners, it will also be possible to register online the day of the Annual Meeting using the secure 15-DIGIT Control Number received with the voting instruction form. Please note, however, that this option is intended to be provided as a convenience to Beneficial Holders only, and there is no guarantee this option will be available for every type of Beneficial Holder voting control number. The inability to provide this option to any or all Beneficial Holders shall in no way impact the validity of the Annual Meeting.

To safely ensure your ability to participate at the Annual Meeting. This means that the ten nominees who receive the largest numberMeeting, Beneficial Holders are advised to register in advance of “FOR” votes cast will be elected as directors. Abstentions from voting and broker non-votes, if any on Proposal One will have no effect on outcome of the election of Directors.

Proposal Two:

Proposal Two requires only the vote of the majority of the “votes cast” at the Annual Meeting. Because abstentions from voting and broker non-votes are not treated as “votes cast”, they will have no effect on outcome of the passage of the proposal.

How does the Board recommend that I vote?

The Board of Directors urges you to read the Proxy statement carefully and then vote your shares for the Annual Meeting. The Board of Directors recommends that you vote “FOR” all of the director nominees listed in Proposal One. The Board also recommends that you vote “FOR” Proposal Two.

3

How are shares voted?

For proposal One, a shareholder may:

For Proposal Two, a shareholder may:

If the accompanying proxy is properly signed and returned and is not withdrawn or revoked, the shares represented thereby will be voted in accordance with the specifications thereon. If the manner of voting such shares is not indicated on the Proxy, the shares will be voted“FOR” the election of each of the nominees for directors named in Proposal One, and“FOR” the approval of Proposal Two. Your shares will also be voted in the discretion of the proxy committee on any other business properly brought forth at the Annual Meeting.

If your shares are held by a broker, your broker is not permittedPlease go to discretionarily votewww.meetnow.global/MF5TPAG for more information on your behalfthe available options and registration instructions.

The online meeting will begin promptly at 1:30 PM EST. We encourage you to access the meeting prior to the start time leaving ample time for the check in. Please follow the registration instructions as outlined in this proxy statement.

5

Do I need to register to participate in the absenceAnnual Meeting virtually?

Registration is only required if you are a Beneficial Holder, as set forth above. In addition, regardless of voting instructions fromwhether you for Proposal One. Forintend to participate in this year’s virtual Annual Meeting, you may direct your vote prior to be counted in the election of directors and for the approval of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm you must communicate your voting decisions to your bank, broker or other holder of record before the date of the Annual Meeting.

How do I vote my shares without attending the meeting?

Whether you hold shares directly or in “street name”, you may direct your vote without attending the Annual Meeting. If you are a shareholder of record, you may vote by granting a proxy as follows:shares?

https://www.investorvote.com/FMAO

●

By Mail – You may vote by mail by signing and dating your proxy card and mailing it in the envelope provided. You should sign your name exactly as it appears on the proxy card. If you are signing in a representative capacity (for example as guardian, trustee, custodian, attorney, or officer of a corporation), you should indicate your name and title or capacity.

Your vote by phone or internet is valid as authorized by the Ohio General Corporation Law.

For shares held in “street name”, by Beneficial Owners, you should follow the voting instructions provided by your broker or nominee. You may complete and mail a voting instruction card to your broker or nominee or, in some cases, submit voting instructions by telephone or the internet. If you provide specific voting instructions by mail, telephone, or internet, your broker or nominee will vote your shares as you have directed. Under NYSE Rule 452, brokers will no longer be allowed to vote uninstructed shares in regard to the election of directors.

Online voting will also be available during the Annual Meeting, but Record Holders and Beneficial Holders are both strongly encouraged to submit their proxy or voting instructions in advance of the Annual Meeting.

How do I votewill my shares in person at the meeting?be voted?

EvenYour proxy, if you planproperly submitted and not revoked prior to attend the meeting, we encourage you to vote by mail, phone or internet so your voteits use, will be counted ifvoted in accordance with the instructions you later decidegive. Properly submitted proxies that do not to attendcontain voting instructions and that are not “broker non-votes” will be voted (1) FOR the meeting.

4

If you choose to vote atdirector nominees identified in Proposal One herein; (2) FOR Nonbinding Say-on-Proposal; (3) FOR the ratification of the appointment of FORVIS, LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2024 and (4) in accordance with the best judgment of the persons appointed as proxies upon the transaction of such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting:

What does it mean if I receive more than one proxy?

It likely means you hold shares registered in more than one account. To ensure that all of your shares are voted, sign and return each proxy.Meeting.

May I changerevoke my vote?proxy?

Yes. The presenceYou may revoke your proxy at any time before it is exercised by (i) filing written notice of a shareholderrevocation to be received prior to voting at the Annual Meeting will not automatically revoke such shareholder’s previously submitted proxy. However, shareholders may revoke a proxy at any time prior to its exercise by filing with the Secretary of the Company a written notice of revocation, by delivering to the Company a duly executed proxy bearing a later date than a previously submitted proxy, or by attending the Annual Meeting and notifying the Inspector of Elections of his or her intention to vote in person. Written notices of revoked proxies may be directed to Ms. Norma J. Kauffman,Marilyn Johnson, Inspector of Elections of Farmers & Merchants Bancorp, Inc., 307 NorthN. Defiance Street, Archbold, Ohio 43502.

When will43502; (ii) submitting a valid proxy bearing a later date that is received prior to voting at the proxy and annual report be mailed to shareholders?

This Proxy Statement andAnnual Meeting; or (iii) participating in the accompanying Notice of Annual Meeting online and giving notice of Shareholders and Proxy are being mailedrevocation to the Company’s shareholders on or about March 15, 2018.

How may I view the proxy and annual report electronically?

You may access the reports by going to our website at the following address:

http://www.fm.bank/proxy(FMAO)fm2017/fm_info.cfmInspector of Elections.

How many shares are owned by Directors and Executive Officers?

All directors and named executive officers of the Company as a group (comprised of 1516 individuals), beneficially held 417,4421,077,896 shares of the Company’s common stock as of December 31, 2017,January 1, 2024, representing 4.51%7.89% of the outstanding common stock of the Company.

56

PROPOSAL ONE

Election of Directors and Information Concerning Directors and Officers

Pursuant to the Code of Regulations of Farmers & Merchants Bancorp, Inc. the number of directors is currently set at ten.thirteen. Set forth below, as of the record date, is information concerning the nominees for election to the Board of Directors. The following persons have been nominated as directors by the Board of Directors upon the recommendation of the Company’s Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee to serve until the Annual Meeting of shareholdersShareholders in 2019:2025:

The following table sets forth certain information with respect to the named executive officers of the Company and the Bank. Executive officers of the Company are appointed annually at the organizational meeting of the Company’s Board of Directors.

The following table sets forth the number of shares of common stock beneficially owned on December 31, 20172023 by each director and nominee, and all directors and named executive officers as a group. As of the date of this Proxy Statement, management is not aware of any person who beneficially owns more than five percent of the Company’s common stock.

Committees of the Board of Directors

The following table summarizes the membership of the Board of Directors as of December 31, 2017 and2023, each of its committees, and the number of times each met during 2017.2023.

Corporate Governance

Starting in 2003, the Company reviewed its corporate governance policies as a matter of good business practices and in light of the passage of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“Sarbanes Oxley”) and regulations promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and listing standards adopted by NASDAQ. While the corporate governance requirements set forth in the NASDAQ listing standards were not applicable to the Company at that time, because it was not listed on NASDAQ, the Company chose to

9

implement most of those corporate governance policies to encourage appropriate conduct among the members of its Board of Directors, officers and employees and to assure that the Company operates in an efficient and ethical manner. On May 10, 2017, the Company began listing on the NASDAQ Stock Exchange and became subject to the NASDAQ Capital Market listing standards and corporate governance requirements.requirements and complies with all of the corporate governance requirements applicable to it as a NASDAQ listed security. In addition to the NASDAQ requirements, the Company is subject to and complies with the applicable governance requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

In consideration of the size, complexity, and nature of the Company’s business, the Board of Directors, and Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee have chosen to establish separate positions for the President and the Board Chairman in order to maintain a separation of power and duties to further strengthen the governance structure. The Board Chairman is a non-employee, director who is not directly involved with the daily operations of the Company. Thus, the Board Chairman is able to focus attention on corporate structure and future strategic direction. The Board Chairman serves as the leader of the Board of Directors, presiding over full board meetings and ensuring full accountability for the shareholders’ interests. Effectively monitoring the decisions and actions of management is one of the primary roles of the Board of Directors. The President and Chief Executive Officer is a bank insider providing management and leadership for ongoing operations of the Company, as well as the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiary, The Farmers & Merchants State Bank,who is also accountable to the Board of Directors. Succession plans exist for the Board Chairman and President and Chief Executive Officer, as well as Vice Chairman of the Board, and all the Executive Officers of the Bank.

Director Independence

The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company undertakes a review of director independence annually and reports on its findings to the full Board in connection with its recommendation of nominees for election to the Board of Directors. In reviewing the independence of members, the Board of Directors took into account the transactions disclosed under the caption “Related Party Transactions” appearing in this proxy and also considered the following relationship:

Based upon the review and report of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee, the Board of Directors has determined that, with the exception of Mr. Siebenmorgen, the current President and Chief Executive Officer: (A) all directors have met the independence standards of the NASDAQ Marketplace Rules; and (B) no directors have any relationship which, in the opinion of the Board, would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director.director, with the exceptions of, Mr. Eller, the current President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company and the Bank, and Mr. Briggs, the former First Senior Vice President of Business Development/Indiana of the Bank, who retired in December of 2022, who are both deemed not to be independent. In addition, the members of each of the Compensation Committee, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee, and the Audit Committee were determined to be, and under the terms of the respective charters, will continue to be “independent” pursuant to standards adopted by NASDAQ for such committees.

Committee Charters

The Board of Directors has adopted charters for the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee, the Enterprise Risk Management Committee, and the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee. Copies of the charters for each of these committees are available on the Bank’s website (www.fm.bank), and are available upon request from the Company. Shareholders desiring a paper copy of one or all of the charters should address written requests to Ms. Lydia A. Huber, Melinda L. Gies, Board Administrator/Corporate Secretary of Farmers & Merchants Bancorp, Inc., 307 North Defiance Street, Archbold, Ohio 43502.

10

Code of Conduct and Ethics

The Board of Directors has adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics (the “Code”). The Code applies to all officers, directors and employees of the Company and the Bank. The administration of the Code has been delegated to the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors, a committee comprised entirely of “independent directors”.independent directors. The Code addresses topics such as compliance with laws and regulations, honest and ethical conduct, conflicts of interest, confidentiality and protection of Company assets, fair dealing, and accurate and timely periodic reports, and also provides for enforcement mechanisms. The Board and management of the Company intend to continue to monitor not only the developing legal requirements in this area, but also the best practices of comparable companies, to assure that the Company maintains sound corporate governance practices in the future.

12

A copy of the Company’s Code is available on the website of the Bank (www.fm.bank). In addition, a copy of the Code is available to any shareholder free of charge upon request. Shareholders desiring a copy of the Code should address written requests to Ms. Lydia A. Huber, Melinda L. Gies, Board Administrator/Corporate Secretary of Farmers & Merchants Bancorp, Inc., 307 North Defiance Street, Archbold, Ohio 43502, and are asked to mark Code of Business Conduct and Ethics on the outside of the envelope containing the request.

Nominations for Members of the Board of Directors

As noted above under “Corporate Governance”,Governance,” the Company has a Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee. The current members of the committee all are “independent directors” (as defined by NASDAQ).independent directors. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee has developed a policy regarding the consideration of nominations for directors by shareholders. The policy is posted on the Bank’s website for review by shareholders. As outlined in its policy, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee will consider nominations from shareholders, although it does not actively solicit such nomination recommendations. Proposed nominations should be addressed to Chairman of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee of Farmers & Merchants Bancorp, Inc., 307 North Defiance Street, Archbold, Ohio 43502. Such nominations must include a description of the specific qualifications the candidate possesses and a discussion as to the effect on the composition and effectiveness of the Board. The identification and evaluation of all candidates for nomineenomination to the Board of Directors are undertaken on an ad hoc basis within the context of the Company’s strategic initiatives, at the time a vacancy occurs on the Board, or as anticipated retirement dates approach. In evaluating all candidates, including candidates recommended for nomination by shareholders, the committeeCommittee considers a variety of factors, including the candidate’s integrity, independence, qualifications, skills, occupation, experience (including experiences in finance and banking), familiarity with accounting rules and practices, and compatibility with existing members of the Board. In addition, attributes such as place of residence and geographic markets represented, age, gender, ethnicity, race, involvement and visibility in the counties and communities represented by the Company’s current and future geographic footprint, and relationships with the Company and the Bank are given consideration. A candidate’s occupation and experience are given high importance. Other than the foregoing, there are no stated minimum criteria for nominees, although the committeeCommittee may consider such other factors as it may deem at the time to be in the best interest of the Company and its shareholders, which factors may change from time to time.

To maintain a wide-ranging mix of individuals, primary consideration is given to the depth and breadth of an individual’s business and civic experience in leadership positions, as well as their ties to the Farmers & Merchants Bancorp, Inc.’sCompany’s markets. Consideration has been given to the number of directors based on the board size of the ninenineteen peer bank holding companies as identified in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis for comparison of executive officer compensation. A formal Board Self-Evaluation was not deemed necessary in 2017.

With the retirement of Darryl Faye from theThe Board of Directors in September 2017, theconducted both an annual Self-Evaluation and Director Peer Evaluation during 2023. Attention is given to each director’s attendance at board meetings and committee evaluated the present size of the Board of Directorsmeetings, as well as anticipated retirement dates and need to fill the open position. The open seat on the Board of Directors was closed for the present time and the number of seats on the Board of Directors was reduced to ten (10).other events that might affect a director’s continued service. All current directors identified in Proposal One were deemed eligible for nomination in the ensuing year.

In June 2023, in consideration of upcoming retirement dates of directors, an additional seat was opened on the Board of Directors which increased the number of Board Directors to 13. This action was intended to bring on a new director and provide sufficient time to become familiar with the Company, Board of Director and Board Committee structure, and expected duties as a member of the Board of Directors.

The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee will continue to assess and evaluate how the Board of Directors is functioning and whether additional board members are needed. Attention will also be given to anticipated retirement dates and other events that might affect a director’s continued service.

OUR BOARD COMPOSITION

The Company believes in the benefits diversity brings to the Board of Directors. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee developed a Board Diversity and Inclusion Policy which was adopted in November 2021 and is reviewed annually. This Policy conforms with NASDAQ rules issued to assure minimum levels of board diversity for all listed companies. The Board Diversity and Inclusion Policy recognizes that diversity of thought makes prudent business sense. Having a board composed of individuals

1113

with gender, racial, and ethnic diversity, as well as skills, experience, backgrounds, and perspectives provides for:

In consideration of board composition, diversity includes, but is not limited to, business and industry skills, experience, gender, ethnicity, and geography. In evaluating the current board composition, as well as potential candidates, based on their skills, experience, independence, and knowledge, it is the belief that the Board should also collectively reflect the diverse nature of the business environment in which the Company operates. In its evaluation of potential director nominees, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee gives significant consideration to racial, gender and ethnic diversity in conjunction with business and industry skills, leadership experience, geographic representation and the added value to the Company and its stakeholders. The Board of Directors aspires to attain levels of board composition in which females and underrepresented minorities are adequately represented. The Board Diversity and Inclusion Policy establishes a process to be followed by the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee to attract female and racially diverse candidates who would enhance the balance of skills and background on the Board.

Based upon voluntary self-identification by each member of the Company’s Board of Directors, the diversity composition of the Board of Directors for the current year is disclosed as follows:

BOARD DIVERSITY MATRIX (AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2023)

16

17

18

19

20

21

Shareholder Communication

The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee has been designated by the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines to receive, review and respond, as appropriate, to communications concerning the Company from employees, officers, shareholders and other interested parties that such parties want to address to non-management members of the Board of Directors. Shareholders who want to direct such questions to the non-management members of the Board of Directors should address them to the Chairman of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee, Farmers & Merchants Bancorp, Inc., 307 North Defiance Street, Archbold, Ohio 43502.

Policy on Annual Meeting Attendance

The Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines also contain a provision stating that it is expected that all members of the Board of Directors will attend the Annual Meeting of Shareholders. All of the members of the Board of Directors attended the 2023 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. 

Respectfully submitted by the members of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee:

Dr. Marcia S. Latta, Chairman

Jo Ellen Hornish, Jack C. Johnson, Frank R. Simon

22

Hedging Practices

The Company has not adopted any practice or policies regarding the ability of directors or employees (including officers), or their designees, to purchase financial instruments, or otherwise engage in transactions, that are designed to hedge or offset any decrease in the market value of the Company’s stock held by such insiders.

Risk Oversight

The Board of Directors is responsible for ensuring that an adequate risk management framework is in place and functioning as intended. A clear understanding and working knowledge of the types of risks inherent to the Company’s activities are an absolute necessity. The Risk Committee is comprised of various members of Senior Management, Department Leaders, Compliance, Internal Audit and Risk Management. The Risk Committee is responsible for loss control and day-to-day oversight of the risk management function.

The risk management program focuses risk assessment on nine risk categories. Risk Committee meetings are held monthly. Several risk categories are reviewed each month, and all risk categories are reviewed quarterly. A five-tier rating system is used to assign a risk rating to each risk category and ratings are defined as Low, Limited, Moderate, Considerable, or High based on the significance of the risk and a defined risk trend (Increasing, Decreasing, or Stable). Additional internal bank experts may attend meetings during each quarter to report on a risk category under review and offer recommendations regarding the risk assessment and trend for a particular risk category. Results of the monthly review of risk categories are reported to the Board of Directors Enterprise Risk Management Committee (ERM) each quarter. In addition, the Company’s risk position is reported to the Board of Directors quarterly. Risk management reports include the following:

Interest Rate Risk

Interest rate risk is a large component of asset/liability management and is managed within the overall asset/liability framework. The principal objectives of asset/liability management are to manage sensitivity of net interest spreads and net interest income to potential changes in interest rates. Funding positions are kept within predetermined limits designed to ensure that risk-taking is not excessive and that liquidity is properly managed. The Board of Directors seeks to address interest rate and non-interest income risk tolerances and, thereby, control risks. Goals are (1) to increase the dollar amount of net interest income at a growth rate consistent with the growth rate of total assets and, given fluctuations in the external interest-rate environment, (2) to minimize fluctuations in net interest margin as a percentage of earning assets.

This type of risk focuses on the economic scenarios relative to the value of the Bank in the current interest rate environment, and the sensitivity to that value from changes in interest rates. Re-pricing risk, basis risk, yield curve risk, and options risk are types of interest risk to be considered. Interest rate risk occurs due to differences between the timing of rate changes and the timing of cash flows (re-pricing(re-pricing risk); from changing rate relationships among different yield curves affecting bank activities (basis risk); and from changing rate relationships across the range of maturities (yield curve risk); and from interest-related options embedded in bank products (options risk). Interest risk considerations typically include the effect of a change in interest rates on both the bank’sBank’s accrual earnings and the market value of portfolio equity.

Interest rate sensitivity refers to the Bank’s capability and/or need to react to actual and forecast interest rates and yields in the money and capital markets as well as in the local competitive environment. The magnitude of these gains or losses depends on the severity and timing of the market changes and on the ability to adjust. The ability to adjust is controlled by the remaining time to maturity of fixed-rate contracts, customer actions, and the existence of contracts that provide for rate adjustments prior to maturity. Analysis of interest rate sensitivity in the form of a net interest rate shock is employed. In performing interest rate shock analysis, financial forecasting and simulation are used to anticipate the impact of forecast interest rates and evaluate the potential risk of alternative interest rates. This policy is implemented by first producing a current forecast of balance sheet volumes and net earnings for the 12 month12-month forecast horizon. The second step is for eight alternative simulations to be prepared to test the forecast’s sensitivity to interest-rate shocks and changes in the shape of the treasury yield curve. The four alternative simulations are +/- 100, +/- 200, +/- 300 and +/+/-400 basis point shift. After each alternative simulation, the forecast net interest income for the twelve-month period and the present value of equity at the end of the historical period are compared to the net interest income and present value of equity produced by the alternative simulation. The percent changes in net interest income and present value of equity isare then compared to management’s guideline targets. The Bank also looks at varying scenarios such as nonparallel shifts in the yield curve. The model used for the simulations continues to be analyzed for possible refinements to assumptions. However, neither of financial forecasting or simulation adequately forecasts the impact of potential changes in interest rates on net interest income. A yearly forecast of balance sheet volumes and net earnings is relied upon as a basis for asset liability decisions. Each forecast is subject to testing for alternative interest rate possibilities to evaluate the risk inherent in management’s plans. The alternative interest rate possibilities are (1) an immediate 200 basis point change in average interest rates, or (2) a more gradual change in average interest rates. Management believes the first method (instant change) would portray the worst caseworst-case scenario as an impact on net interest earnings. Therefore, method 1 is used in the interest rate shock analysis.

Liquidity Risk

Liquidity risk may impact earnings or capital based on changes in funding sources. This risk affects the Bank’s ability to establish new relationships, service, or continue to service existing relationships. This risk can also expose the Bank to litigation, financial loss, or damage to its reputation. Liquidity risk exposure is present in various funding situations. Thus, the Bank is responsible for careful evaluation of the types and levels of risk incurred in dealing with its customers and communities. The liquidity risk policy provides direction and guidance for the management of funding sources, which also affects interest rate risk

18

and price risk. Guidance offered provides controls for the risk arising from taking positions in various liquid assets and short-term deposits regarding anticipated changes in interest rates. Controls are vital to the continuity of operations and protections of resources, depositors, and shareholders. It also assists in maximizing the return on shareholder investment without sacrificing its quality and reputation. Various elements of funding volume and funding gaps are analyzed, the availability and size of secondary markets to convert instruments

24

to cash is reviewed, the Bank’s cost of funding versus costs paid by competition are assessed, and rate scenarios and stress testing models are used to assess vulnerability. This risk is evaluated and assigned a risk rating with the assessment of overall risk.

Price Risk

Price risk involves risk that may impact earnings or capital resulting from changes in the value of portfolios of financial instruments. This risk affects the Bank’s ability to establish new relationships, service, or continue to service existing relationships. Management of this risk is conducted under specific guidelines and product/service standards. Guidelines assist in establishing, reevaluating, and changing prices for financial services or financial products. These guidelines are structured to ensure an appropriate pricing structure, but also address such issues as volume and price sensitivity for various products. Sources of price risk are identified, elements of the of the risk positions are analyzed, the flexibility of the current price profile versus the ability to hedge the risk is assessed, the proper balance of risk versus reward is determined, and appropriate levels of procedures, controls, and self-monitoring are evaluated for implementation and proper administration. A risk rating is assigned in conjunction with the assessment of overall risk.

Foreign Exchange Risk

Foreign Exchange Risk may occur to earnings or capital as a result of movement of foreign exchange rates due to cross-border investing and operating activities. Market making and position taking in foreign currencies involve foreign exchange risk. In most instances foreign checks received are sent for collection. Risk is minimized with issuance of drafts, letters of credit, and wire transfers through correspondent banks. Risk exposure involves litigation, financial loss, and damage to its reputation. Foreign exchange risk is monitored and evaluated and assigned a risk rating with the assessment of overall risk.

Compliance Risk

Compliance risk is monitored within the structure of the compliance risk management program. Operating in compliance with laws, rules, regulations, and related accepted industry standards enhances the reputation, strategic goals and objectives, and operations of the Company. Compliance risk attempts to evaluate and identify the overall level of compliance risk by measuring and defining the areas of risk for a designated law, rule, or regulation. Defined risk factors within three risk categories (legal and regulatory, operational, and reputation risk) assist in determining the overallThe compliance risk assessment is designed to identify the quantity of risk, the adequacy of risk management systems, and the resulting residual risk. In measuring and quantifying inherent risk, an impact rating is assigned to each law rule, or regulation. Variousand regulation along with a quantity exposure rating to arrive at an inherent risk rating. Risk management and control factors within eachare used to measure and assess the effectiveness in identifying, measuring, monitoring, and controlling risk. Residual risk category can increase or decreasemeasures the aggregate risk that remains for a specific risk that is leftover from inherent risk and the application of non-compliance. Each risk category is assigned amanagement and controls. Risk assessment conclusions result in an overall inherent risk rating, of High, Moderate, or Low. The overall compliancerisk management and controls rating, and residual risk rating for each law or regulation is the average of the risk ratings for the three risk categories.Lending and Lending Operations, Deposit Services and Operations, and Management and Operations. The compliance risk assessment is conducted withannually by the Compliance Committee and key business lines, departments, and functional areas.Risk Management group. Compliance risk assessment results are reviewed by the Compliance Committee which has representation from key business lines, departments, and functional areas, and reported to the Risk Committee, the Enterprise Risk Management Committee, and the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors.

In addition to an overall compliance risk assessment, specific regulations require risk assessments based on defined risk factors. Identity Theft Red Flags regulations require an annual Identity Theft risk assessment. The purpose of this risk assessment is to periodically review and update the Identity Theft Red Flag Program based on methods used to open accounts, methods available to access accounts, ongoing account monitoring, and the Company’s experiences with identity theft. Regulators expect a risk assessment process for Fair Lending risk. A fair lending risk assessment servesis conducted to verify how lending activities are identified, monitored, measured, and controlled, to make sure discriminatory, unfair, deceptive, abusive, and predatory acts and practices do not take place. A fair lendingThis risk assessment is conducted to evaluateevaluates the present risk management process and risk mitigation strategies. Risk indicators defined by interagency

19

Fair Lending Examination Procedures are used to assess fair lending risk. In evaluating the risk in lending activities, the following factors are considered: changes in leadership and staffing, new products, product pricing, product and service offerings, policies and procedures, processes, and changes or updates to systems. Other factors considered includedinclude the present economy of the region, the market area served, and market area demographics. TheseThe fair lending risk assessments areassessment is conducted with key business lines, departments, and functional areas as applicable.annually by the Risk Management group. Fair Lending Risklending risk assessment results are reviewed bywith the Compliance Committee and reported to the Risk Committee, Enterprise Risk Management Committee, and Audit Committee of the Board of Directors.

25

Identity Theft Red Flag regulations specifically require an annual identity Theft risk assessment. The purpose of this risk assessment is periodically review and update the Identity Theft Red Flag Program based on methods used to open accounts, methods available to access accounts, ongoing account monitoring, and the Company’s experiences with identity theft. This risk assessment are reviewed with the Compliance Committee, and reported to the Risk Committee, and Enterprise Risk Management Committee of the Board Audit Committee.of Directors.

An overall complianceRisk-based, comprehensive risk assessment isassessments are conducted forcovering the Bank Secrecy Act, (BSA)Anti-Money Laundering, and Office of Foreign Asset Control (OFAC). Additionally, more in depthto ensure all risk assessments for BSA, Anti-Money Laundering (AML), Customer Identification Program (CIP), and OFACareas are conducted on an as needed basis by a select group of BSA trained individualsidentified to maintain compliance with the resultslaws and regulatory guidance. Results from the assessment of risks are reported as necessary to the Compliance Committee, the Enterprise Risk Management Committee, and the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors for approval.Directors. At least annually, the quantified results are reported toBSA and OFAC risk assessment is reviewed and approved by the Board of Directors. These Risk is rarely static, and thus frequent review and additional approvals may be necessary. The risk assessments focus on risk factors due to the Bank’s size, market presence, types of customers, types of products, geographic location,locations, method of account opening, transaction type, and business line. All are incorporated into BSA/AML software to aid in the monitoring and reporting requirements.

The Board of Directors has also established a Disclosure Committee comprised of select officers. The Disclosure Committee has implemented and documented disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that disclosures made by the Company to its security holders and the investment community fairly and accurately present the Company’s financial condition and results of operations in all material respects on a timely basis as required by applicable securities laws and stock exchange requirements. A Disclosure Committee Charter has been developed to set forth the Disclosure Committee’s responsibilities and provide guidance on fulfilling its obligation to ensure the accuracy and timeliness of the Company’s public reporting process.

Transaction/Operational Risk

Transaction risk relates to service or product delivery and escalates based on problems with services or product delivery. This risk is inherent in all bank products and services and arises on a daily basis as transactions are processed. Controlling transaction risk involves internal controls, vendor management, proper use of information systems, employee integrity, and operating processes. The Board of Directors and Management establish and reevaluate the risk tolerances which thereby control these risks. Policy guidance provides standards to control the potential financial losses due to human error or fraud, incomplete information, or operational disruption. Controlling this risk remains critical to the continuity of operations and protection of resources, depositors, customers, and shareholders. It also assists the Bank to maximize the return on shareholder investment without sacrificing its quality and reputation. Financial services and products are offered on a sound and economically feasible basis to the customers, communities, and markets served. Products and services offered along with the transactions serviced are conducted under specific guidelines and operational standards. Procedures and processes, including the development and introduction of new products and services, encompass the guidelines established.

Control mechanisms have been established to monitor data accuracy, proper accounting treatment, and compliance with laws and regulations, as well as bank policy. Management and staff continually seek training and development to enhance their technical knowledge and skill levels to stay up-to-date on changes in financial service industry operations and industry best practices. Development and issuance of timely internal management reports and bank-wide communication on properly conducting business relative to the transaction risk exposure are ongoing measures. Methodologies to address areas of exposure from human error or fraud, incomplete information, and operational disruption seek to evaluate, mitigate, and identify cost-effective ways to reduce such risks. Analysis and recommendations focus on systems development and utilization, capital investment for technology and hardware, and overall physical premises improvements to ensure efficiency and effectiveness in handling new products and services, complex transactions, and development of new products and services to keep pace with the future.

Strategic Risk

Strategic risk is a function of the compatibility between the bank’s strategic goals, its business strategies, the resources used to meet strategic goals, and the quality of implementation. Resources necessary to carry out

26

business strategies include both those that are tangible and those that are intangible. Strategic risk incorporates management’s analyses of external factors that affect the strategic direction of the bank. Anticipating change, both externally and internally, are essential to managing this risk. Strategic risk arises from adverse business decisions or improper implementations of business decisions.

Addressing specific risk tolerances from a strategic focus aids in controlling this risk. The Board of Directors and management provide direction and guidance regarding merger and acquisition plans, marketing initiatives, initiation of diversity in product elements, technology changes, and other relatedstrategicrelated strategic moves. Controlling this risk is necessary for the continuity of operations and protection of resources, depositors, customers, and shareholders. It also assists in maximizing the return on shareholder investment without sacrificing quality or reputation.

Information Technology Risk

Information Technology (IT) governance is the responsibility of the Board of Directors. The core elements of IT governance encompass value, risk, and controls. Management has appointed the Chief Information Officer the responsibility for overall management of Information Technology risk. IT risk focuses on information and information systems, especially the most critical and vital information assets. Without reliable and properly secured information systems, business operations could be severely disrupted. Likewise, the preservation and enhancement of the Company’s reputation is directly linked to the way in which both information and information systems are managed. Maintaining an adequate level of security is one of several important aspects of managing IT risk.

The Information Systems (IS) Steering Committee shall approve all significant projects throughout the Bank and additionally serves as an advisory group providing assistance and guidance to management regarding customer information security, information systems planning, systems management organization, systems performance, business continuity, information security, system related expenditures, vendor management, and related policies and procedures. The IS Steering Committee is chaired by the Chief Information Officer and meets on a monthly basis. Formal meeting minutes serve to document decisions and recommendations by the IS Steering Committee. Meeting minutes are reported to the Management Committee and the Board ERM Committee.

An annual Information Technology Audit, which is facilitated by the Internal Audit Department, is conducted via a co-sourcing agreement with a third-party auditor. The objective of the IT audit is to evaluate the effectiveness and efficiency of operations, test the reliability of data and IT controls, and ensure compliance with applicable laws, regulations, guidance, and industry best practices. The audit scope addresses IT Governance, IT Management, IT Operations, and IT Security.

Testing of the internal network environment and external network perimeter are included in the Results of the IT Audit and are reviewed with the IS Steering Committee and Management. For any exceptions identified, a responsible party is assigned, and action plans are developed to address corrective measures. The final results of the IT Audit are reviewed with the Board Audit Committee. The status of unresolved audit issues along with their priority ratings is reported to both Management and the Board Audit Committee at each meeting.

Financial Reporting Internal Controls. Sarbanes-Oxley introduced broad and challenging financial management and disclosure regulations. Non-compliance with Sarbanes-Oxley regulations has serious consequences. As an accelerated SEC filer, the requirements of section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act are applicable to the Company. Section 404 requires companies to maintain internal controls and procedures for financial reporting. Management conducts an on-going review of key financial controls over financial reporting that ensures the accuracy of financial statements and entity-level controls that ensure compliance with the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations (COSO) internal control framework requirements. The COSO framework consists of five components that actively impact one another: control environment; risk assessment; control activities; information and communication; and monitoring. These components often overlap and consistently evolve due to changes in the Company’s internal and external environment.

2027

The review includes discussions with employees, process demonstrations, and detailed transaction testing to determine that controls are designed properly and operating effectively. The Company’s external auditor conducts its own Sarbanes-Oxley review independent of management’s review. Both management and the external auditor issue an opinion regarding both the design and operating effectiveness of the key controls over financial reporting. Results of both Sarbanes-Oxley reviews are reported to the Board of Directors.

Information Security. In conformance with Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act requirements regarding safeguarding and protecting customer information, an Information Security Risk Assessment is conducted at least annually by the Risk Department and reviewed with the Risk Committee, the Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) Committee, and the Board of Directors. A risk analysis is performed to evaluate current processes, identify information assets, and determine the adequacy of the safeguarding and protection of confidential customer information collected and maintained. For each information asset identified, the criticality of the asset, the threats to the defined asset, the likelihood of compromise of the asset, the business impact if an asset is compromised, and an overall risk rating for each asset are defined. The results of this assessment are reviewed with the Information Systems (IS) Steering Committee and the Risk Committee and reported at least annually to the Board ERM Committee.

Cybersecurity. The bank has a cybersecurity program that identifies risks; protects bank systems, assets and data; detects intrusions, breaches and unauthorized access; responds to potential events; and recovers from a cyber event by restoring normal operations and services in a timely manner.

Controls and processes for monitoring evolving threats and potential vulnerabilities are maintained and enhanced as needed in response to changes in the bank’s internal and external environment. The FFIEC’s Guidance on Cybersecurity and the NIST Framework for Improving Critical Infrastructure Cybersecurity are used as the basis for defining the bank’s initial control requirements.

Vendor Management. The Board of Directors bears ultimate responsibility to ensure an effective vendor management program has been implemented for proper oversight of outsourced relationships. Management is charged with the responsibility to determine the necessary course of action to develop and maintain a comprehensive vendor management program. Management has appointed the Chief Information Officer to oversee management of the vendor management program. This individual reports directly to the Information Systems (IS)Steering Committee and management. The Vendor/BCP/Project Manager is the focal point for vendor management standards established by the IS Steering Committee and is responsible for implementation of procedures relating to vendor management. A vendor relationship subcommittee has been established to provide assistance and promote appropriate oversight of third-party vendors and service providers, especially technology service providers, who provide products, services, and support for other such activities. Current subcommittee members consist of the Chief Information Officer, the Vendor/BCP/Project Manager, the Chief Risk Officer, the Risk Manager, the Assistant Compliance & CRA Manager, the Vendor/BCP/Management IT, the Item Processing Supervisor, and a Staff Auditor.

The vendor management program is used to identify, measure, monitor, and control the risks associated with outsourcing arrangements. While focusing on information and operational risks, outsourced relationships are reviewed through structured assessments and addressed from an end-to-end perspective. The vendor management process reviews and evaluates the internal controls, maintenance and upkeep of an outsourced product or system, and the financial condition of third-party vendors or service providers prior to selection for a new product or service, or as a condition for continued support of products and services. Third party vendors and service provider relationships are ranked by risk (Critical, GLBA, Infrastructure, Professional, Moderate, Low, Government) and reviewed based on that rated risk as part of subcommittee’s ongoing efforts. Rankings are based on the residual risk of the relationship after analyzing the quantity of risk relative to the controls over those risks. Relationships with high-risk ratings receive more frequent and stringent monitoring for due diligence, performance (financial and/or operational), and independent control validation reviews. 

Management and the Board of Directors use oversight and monitoring documentation when renegotiating contracts, as well as in developing contingency planning requirements. Third party vendors and service providers may be required to sign a formal confidentiality and non-disclosure agreement. Such an agreement

28

binds these parties to the same standards and level of data confidentiality and controls as those adhered to by the Company. High-risk third-party vendors and service providers may be required to provide proof of bonding or insurance. The Chief Information Officer reports annually to the Board of Directors providing an update on the status of the vendor management program along with any significant changes or recommendations to the program.

Reputation Risk

Reputation risk exposure is present throughout the organization.organization and is embedded in the reviews of each risk management category. The types and levels of risk must continually be evaluated in dealings with customers and the communities. Reputation risk refers to the risk to bank capital or earnings arising from negative public opinion. Reputation risk is inherent in all bank activities. It can affect the bank’s ability to establish new relationships or services, as well as its ability to continue servicing its existing relationships. An abundance of caution is needed in dealing with bank customers and the community to preserve the bank’s reputation.

The Board of Directors and management provide direction and guidance for addressing risks to the Company and the Bank’s reputation in the marketplace. Identification of areas of risk minimizes and controls reputation risk. A reputation risk policy offers corporate guidance in anticipating and responding to changes in the market. Controlling this risk is vital to the continuity of operations and protections of resources, depositors, customers, and shareholders. Maximizing the return on shareholder investment without sacrificing quality and reputation are drivers for proper identification and management of reputation risk. Being responsive to Bank customers, making prudent credit risk and interest risk decisions, strong internal controls, sound operations limiting fraud or materials losses, and maintaining strong confidentiality standards are sound practices to minimize reputation risk exposure.

Information Technology Risk

Information Technology (IT) governance is the responsibility of the Board of Directors. The core elements of IT governance encompass value, risk, and controls. Management has appointed the Operations and IT Officer the responsibility for overall management of Information Technology risk. IT risk focuses on information and information systems, especially the most critical and vital information assets. Without reliable and properly secured information systems, business operations could be severely disrupted. Likewise, the preservation and enhancement of the Company’s reputation is directly linked to the way in which both information and information systems are managed. Maintaining an adequate level of security is one of several important aspects of managing IT risk.29

An annual Information Technology Audit, which is facilitated by the Internal Audit Department, is conducted via a co-sourcing agreement with a third party auditor. The objective of the IT audit is to evaluate the effectiveness and efficiency of operations, test the reliability of data and IT controls, and ensure compliance with applicable laws, regulations, guidance, and industry best practices. The audit scope addresses IT Governance, IT Management, IT Operations, and IT Security. The following systems and applications were evaluated based on operational criticality and security risks: Network Resources, Core Data Processing, Internet Banking (Business and Retail), ATM and Debit Cards, Credit Cards, Wire Transfer, ACH Processing, Report and Document Storage, Commercial and Consumer Lending, Mortgage Lending, Custom Report Writing, Accounting, and Payroll.

21

Testing of the internal network environment and external network perimeter are included in the Results of the IT Audit and are reviewed with the IS Steering Committee and Management. For any exceptions identified, a responsible party is assigned and action plans are developed to address corrective measures. The final results of the IT Audit are reviewed with the Board Audit Committee. The status of unresolved audit issues along with their priority ratings is reported to both Management and the Board Audit Committee at each meeting.

Financial Reporting Internal Controls. Sarbanes-Oxley introduced broad and challenging financial management and disclosure regulations. Non-compliance with Sarbanes-Oxley regulations has serious consequences. As an accelerated SEC filer, the requirements of section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act are applicable to the Company. Section 404 requires companies to maintain internal controls and procedures for financial reporting. Management conducts an on-going review of key financial controls over financial reporting that ensures the accuracy of financial statements and entity-level controls that ensure compliance with the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations (COSO) internal control framework requirements. The COSO framework consists of five components that actively impact one another: control environment; risk assessment; control activities; information and communication; and monitoring. These components often overlap and consistently evolve due to changes in the Company’s internal and external environment.

The review includes discussions with employees, process demonstrations, and detailed transaction testing to determine that controls are designed properly and operating effectively. The Company’s external auditor conducts its own Sarbanes-Oxley review independent of management’s review. Both management and the external auditor issue an opinion regarding both the design and operating effectiveness of the key controls over financial reporting. Results of both Sarbanes-Oxley reviews are reported to the Board of Directors.

Information Security. In conformance with Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act requirements regarding safeguarding and protecting customer information, an Information Security Risk Assessment is conducted at least annually by the Risk Department and reviewed with the Risk Committee, the Enterprise Risk Management Committee, and the Board of Directors. A risk analysis is performed to evaluate current processes, identify information assets, and determine the adequacy of the safeguarding and protection of confidential customer information collected and maintained. For each information asset identified, the criticality of the asset, the threats to the defined asset, the likelihood of compromise of the asset, the business impact if an asset is compromised, and an overall risk rating for each asset are defined. The results of this assessment are reviewed with the Information Systems (IS) Steering Committee and the Risk Committee and reported at least annually to the Board ERM Committee.

Vendor Management. The Board of Directors bears ultimate responsibility to ensure an effective vendor management program has been implemented for proper oversight of outsourced relationships. Management is charged with the responsibility to determine the necessary course of action to develop and maintain a comprehensive vendor management program. Management has appointed the Operations and Information Technology Officer/ISO to oversee management of the vendor management program. This individual reports directly to the Information Systems (IS)Steering Committee and management. The Senior Operations Officer is the focal point for vendor management standards established by the IS Steering Committee and is responsible for implementation of procedures relating to vendor management. A vendor relationship subcommittee has been established to provide assistance and promote appropriate oversight of third party vendors and service providers, especially technology service providers, who provide products, services, and support for other such activities. Current subcommittee members consist of the Risk Management Officer, the Operations and Information Technology Officer/ISO, the Senior Operations Officer, and the Assistant Compliance Manager.

The vendor management program is used to identify, measure, monitor, and control the risks associated with outsourcing arrangements. Outsourced relationships are addressed from an end to end perspective. The vendor management process reviews and evaluates the internal controls, maintenance and upkeep of an outsourced product or system, and the financial condition of third party vendors or service providers prior to selection for a new product or service, or as a condition for continued support of products and services. Third party vendors and service provider relationships are ranked by risk (High, Moderate, Low) annually as part of subcommittee’s ongoing efforts. Rankings are based on the residual risk of the relationship after analyzing the quantity of risk relative to the controls over those risks. Relationships with high risk ratings receive more frequent and stringent monitoring for due diligence, performance (financial and/or operational), and independent control validation reviews.

22

Management and the Board of Directors use oversight and monitoring documentation when renegotiating contracts, as well as in developing contingency planning requirements. Third party vendors and service providers may be required to sign a formal confidentiality and non-disclosure agreement. Such an agreement binds these parties to the same standards and level of data confidentiality and controls as those adhered to by the Company. High risk third party vendors and service providers may be required to provide proof of bonding or insurance. The Senior Operations Officer reports annually to the Board of Directors providing an update on the status of the vendor management program along with any significant changes or recommendations to the program.

Audit Committee Report

The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors submits the following report on the performance of its responsibilities for the year 2017.2023. The purposes and responsibilities of the committee are elaborated in the committee charter. The Board of Directors hashad determined that Steven A. Everhart,Lori Johnston, Chairman of the Audit Committee, is awas the “financial expert” as defined under the regulations promulgated under Sarbanes-Oxley. Mr. EverhartMs. Johnston and all of the other members of the Audit Committee have been determined by the Board of Directors to be “independent” under the listing standards of the NASDAQ Marketplace Rules.

Management of the Company has primary responsibility for the financial statements and the overall reporting process, including the Company’s system of internal controls. The independent auditors are responsible for performing an independent audit of the Company’s consolidated financial statements in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB/United States)(PCAOB). This audit serves as a basis for the auditors’ opinion in the annual report to shareholders addressing whether the financial statements fairly present the Company’s financial position, results of operations and cash flows. The Audit Committee’s responsibility is to monitor and oversee these processes.

In reviewing the independence of the Company’s external auditors, the committeeCommittee received from BKD,FORVIS, LLP (“BKD”FORVIS”) the written disclosures and a letter regarding relationships between BKD and its related entities and the Company and its related entities and discussed with BKD its independence from the Company as required by the applicable requirements of the PCAOB.PCAOB regarding FORVIS’s communications with the Committee concerning independence and has discussed with FORVIS its independence.

In fulfilling its responsibilities relating to the Company’s internal controls, accounting and financial reporting policies and auditing practices, the committeeCommittee has reviewed and discussed with management and BKDFORVIS the Company’s audited financial statements for 2017.2023. In this connection, the committeeCommittee has discussed with BKD its judgments aboutFORVIS the quality, in additionmatters required to be discussed by the acceptability,applicable requirements of the Company’s accounting principles as applied in its financial reporting, as required by Statement on Auditing Standards No. 61, as amended (AICPA, Professional Standards, Vol. 1. AU section 380), as adopted by the PCAOB in Rule 3200T.PCAOB. Based on these reviews and discussions, the committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the audited financial statements be included in the Company’s Annual Report on SEC Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 20172023 for filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Respectfully submitted by the members of the Audit Committee:

Steven A. Everhart,Lori Johnston, Chairman

Jo Ellen Hornish, Steven J. Planson, Dr. K. Brad Stamm, David P. Vernon

Selection of Auditors/Principal Accounting Firm Fees

The firm of BKD,FORVIS, independent registered public accountants, was retained by the Audit Committee on behalf of the Company as auditors of the Company and its subsidiarythe Bank for the 20172023 fiscal year. BKDFORVIS was engaged to provide independent audit services for the Company and its subsidiarythe Bank and to provide certain non-audit services including advice on accounting, tax, and reporting matters. BKDFORVIS has again been engaged to provide such services for the 20182024 fiscal year. The Board of Directors expects that a representative of BKDFORVIS will be present at the Annual Meeting, will have the opportunity to make a statement if they desire to do so, and will be available to respond to appropriate questions. The Company has been advised by BKDFORVIS that no member of that firm has any financial interest, either direct or indirect, in the Company or its subsidiary, other than as a depositor, and it has no connections with the Company or its subsidiary in any capacity other than that of public accountants.

23

BKDFORVIS and its affiliates billed the aggregate fees shown below for audit, audit related matters, tax and other services rendered to the Company and its subsidiary for the years 20172023 and 2016.2022. Audit fees include fees billed in connection with the audit of the Company’s annual financial statements, fees billed for the review of the unaudited financial statements contained in the Company’s periodic reports on Form 10-Q, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and assistance in compliance with the internal control requirements mandated by Section 404 of Sarbanes-Oxley. Audit related fees may include consulting on other accounting matters. Tax consulting services included assistance regarding franchise tax and federal and state income tax planning.

BKD

30

FORVIS and its affiliates billedcontracted for the following amounts to the Company and its subsidiary during 20172023 and 2016,2022, respectively for audit, audit related fees, tax fees and all other fees:

PROPOSAL TWO

Advisory Vote on Say-on-Pay

Section 951 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Dodd-Frank Act”) adopted new Section 14A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Pursuant to Section 14A(a)(1), companies that are subject to the federal proxy rules, like the Company, are required to provide shareholders a nonbinding advisory vote on the executive compensation programs of the Company. This proposal, commonly known as a “Say-on-Pay” proposal, gives you as a shareholder the opportunity to endorse or not endorse our executive compensation programs. The Company conducted the last “Say-on-Pay” vote at the 2023 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. In accordance with the general preference of shareholders to have Say-on-Pay proposals every year, shareholders again have the opportunity to cast their advisory votes in consideration of the Company’s executive compensation program at this year’s Annual Meeting. The Board of Directors and Committee will evaluate the results of this year’s advisory vote to determine whether changes to such policies and practices may be necessary or appropriate to address shareholder concerns.

As discussed in “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” below the Compensation Committee has determined that the compensation structure for the Company’s executive officers is effective and appropriate and has determined that the Company’s executive compensation programs are reasonable and not excessive. Shareholders are encouraged to read the section of this Proxy Statement entitled “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” as well as the tabular disclosure regarding Named Executive Officer compensation together with the accompanying narrative disclosure. The following resolution is presented for consideration at the annual meeting:

“Resolved, that the shareholders approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation programs of the Company as disclosed in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the accompanying compensation tables and the related narrative disclosure of the Proxy Statement for the 2024 Annual Meeting.”

Vote Required to Approve

The affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast by the holder of the Company’s common stock at the Annual Meeting is required to approve Proposal Two.

32

PROPOSAL TWOTHREE

Advisory Vote on the Appointment of the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors proposes and recommends that the shareholders approve the selection by the Committee of the firm of BKD,FORVIS, LLP to serve as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the 20182024 fiscal year. Action by the shareholders is not required by law in the appointment of an independent registered public accounting firm, but their appointment is submitted by the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors in order to give the shareholders a voice in the designation of auditors.

If the resolution approving BKD,FORVIS, LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm is rejected by the shareholders, the Committee will reconsider its choice of independent auditors. Even if the resolution is approved, the Audit Committee in its discretion may direct the appointment of different independent auditors at any time during the year if it determines that such a change would be in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders.

Vote Required to Approve

The affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast by the holders of the Company’s common stock is required to approve Proposal Two.Six.

33

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Introduction. The Compensation Committee administers our executive compensation program. The committee,Committee, which is composed entirely of independent directors, is responsible for reviewing and determining executive officerauthorizing the compensation forphilosophy, evaluating the President and Chief Executive Officer for overseeing(CEO) performance, setting the evaluation of all other officersCEO’s total rewards package based upon performance, market data and employees, for administering our incentive compensation programs (including the long-term stock incentive plan), for approving and overseeing the administration of our employee benefits programs, for providing insight and guidance to management with respect to employee compensation, and for reviewingpeer group information and making recommendations to the Board with respect to director compensation. The PresidentCommittee provides oversight for executive succession, the Company’s annual and Chief Executive Officer participates with respect to making recommendations concerning annual salary adjustmentslong-term incentive programs and long term equity incentivewill provide guidance regarding compensation, regarding executive officers (otherbenefits plans, succession and other organizational matters involving employees other than himself) of the Company.CEO.

The Compensation Committee operates under a charter adopted by the Board of Directors. Annually, the Compensation Committee reviews and approves the adequacy of its charter and recommends changes toratification by the full Board for approval.of Directors. The Compensation Committee meets at scheduled times during the year and also acts upon occasion by written consent. The Chair of the Compensation Committee reports on committeeCommittee activities and makes committeeCommittee recommendations at meetings of the Board of Directors.

Compensation Philosophy. Our executive compensation programs seek to achieve and maintain equity with respect to balancing the interests of shareholders and executive officers, while supporting our need to attract and retain competent executive management. The Compensation Committee has developed an executive compensation policy, along with supporting executive compensation plans and programs, which are intended to attain the following objectives:

The committee collects and analyzes comparative executive compensation information from relevant peer groups, approves executive salary adjustments, recommends executive discretionary cash-based incentive/compensation program thresholds, and administers the Company’s long term stock incentive plan (the “Long Term Incentive Plan”). Additionally, from time to time, the committee reviews other human resource issues, including benefits, management performance appraisals, and succession planning.

25

The committeeCommittee uses comparisons of competitive executive pay practices taken from banking industry compensation surveys and, from time-to-time, consultation with independent executive compensation advisors. Peer groups and competitive compensation practices are determined using executive compensation packages at bank holding companies and subsidiaries of comparable size to the Company and its subsidiary.the Bank. In evaluating Peer Group Companies,peer group companies, the base salary and incentive compensation paid to the chief executive officer of each of the following ninenineteen peer bank holding companies, (symbol), as well as the respective ROA (Return on Assets) of each are taken into consideration. The committeeCommittee reviews this information at least once a year in conjunction with events in the industry and marketplace to determine if any changes or revisions are deemed necessary. For 20172023 compensation considerations, the Peer Group Companiespeer group companies consisted of ninenineteen bank holding companies: ChoiceOne Financial Services, Inc. (COFS), Civista Bancshares, (CVIB)Inc. (CIVB), Farmers National Banc Corp. (FMNB), First Defiance Financial Corp (FDEF)Corporation (THFF), Mutual First Internet Bancorp (INBK), First Savings Financial Group, Inc. (MFSF)(FSFG). Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP), Horizon Bancorp (HBNC)Isabella Bank Corporation (ISBA), LCNB Corp. (LCNB), MBT Financial Corp. (MBTF)Macatawa Bank Corporation (MCBC), Middlefield Bank Corporation (MBCN), Mercantile Bank Corporation (WBWM), Richmond Mutual Bancorporation, Inc. (RMBI), SB Financial Group, Inc. (SBFG), Arbor Bancorp, Inc. (Privately held), Star financial Group (SFIGA), Finward Bancorp (FNWD), Waterford (Privately held), and United Bancshares Inc. (UBOH)First Berne Financial Corp. (Privately held).

The financial performance of the selected peer group bank holding companies is also evaluated relevantrelative to the performance of peers located outside of the Midwest, whichMidwest. This information is made available by the FDIC as part of its Uniform Bank Performance Report. The Company may periodically review and adjust the selected peer group companies in conjunction with a regular review of executive compensation pay and practices in connection with future compensation decisions.

In making its decisions regarding annual salary adjustments, the committeeCommittee reviews quantitative and qualitative performance factors as part of an annual performance appraisal. These are established for each executive position and the performance of the incumbent executive is evaluated annually against these

34

standards. This appraisal is then integrated with market-based adjustments to salary ranges to determine if a base salary increase is merited.

The committeeCommittee administers the cash-based annual incentive compensation program and the Long TermLong-Term Stock Incentive Plan. Cash-based incentive bonusesincentives and equity awards are at-risk compensation. Awards under these programs are recommended by the committeeCommittee to the Board of Directors when, in the judgment of committeeCommittee members, such awards are deemed to provide executive officers a reasonable incentivereward for the achievement of the Company’s mid and long-term strategic objective,objectives and are otherwise justified by the performance of executive officers in relation to the performance of the Company.

The accounting and tax treatment of particular forms of compensation do not materially affect the committee’sCommittee’s compensation decisions. However, the committeeCommittee evaluates the effect of such accounting and tax treatment on an ongoing basis and will make appropriate modifications to its compensation policies where appropriate.

Components of Compensation. The elements of total compensation paid by the Company to its senior officers, including the President and Chief Executive Officer (the “CEO”) and the other executive officers identified in the Summary Compensation Table which appears following this Compensation Discussion and Analysis (the CEO and the other executive officers identified in that Table are sometimes referred to collectively as the “Named Executive Officers”), include the following:

Base Salary. The base salaries of the Named Executive Officers are reviewed by the committeeCommittee annually as well as at the time of any promotion or significant change in job responsibilities. The committee reviews peer group data to establish a market-competitive executive base salary program, in conjunction with a formal performance appraisal system that focuses on awards that are integrated with

26

strategic corporate objectives. Salary income for each Named Executive OfficeOfficer for calendar year 20172023 is reported in the “Salary” column 1 of the Summary Compensation Table, which appears following this Compensation Discussion and Analysis.

In making its decisions regarding annual salary adjustments for 2018,2023, the Compensation Committee reviewed quantitative and qualitative performance factors, as part of an annual performance appraisal. This appraisal is then integrated withpeer compensation comparisons, market-based adjustments to salary ranges, and overall performance of the Company to determine if a base salary increase is merited. Based on these factors, the committee increased Mr. Siebenmorgen’s annual base salary by 3.00% for 2018.adjustments.

Cash-Based Incentive Compensation Program. The Company has established a cash-based incentive compensation program. The cash incentive for executive officers under this plan is based on two criteria. The first is return on average assets (“ROA”) of the Bank.

If the ROA of the Bank equals the target ROA of 1.00%1.10%, executive officers receive the full cash incentive established. The targeted goal of ROA is based on reviewing the projected budget, the fivefive- and ten yearten-year history and average of the Bank along with peer, industry, and other information requested by the Compensation Committee. The calculated ROA is inclusive of the cost of the incentive and is net of the captive insurance expense and acquisition costs at the Bank level. The full cash incentive under this criterion is equivalent to 30% of base salary for the CEO and 20% of base salary for the remaining executive officers. If the ROA of the Bank is equal to .70%0.85%, fifty percent of the incentive is paid. If the ROA is between .70%0.85% and 1.00%1.10%, the incentive is paid on a prorated basis. Should the ROA exceed 1.00%1.10%, the incentive paid would be increased accordingly. At an ROA of .65%, a forty percent payout is made. Again, with ROA between .65% and .70%, the payout is prorated. Should the ROA be below .65%.60%, no cash incentive is paid under the computation;computation. For any amount between 0.60-0.85% the incentive is paid at 2% for each basis point. Incentive compensation would then be paid under the same terms to all employees of the Bank. The projected 2017 incentive was based on a calculated ROA base of 1.096% which is inclusive of the cost of the incentive and is net of the captive insurance expense. An ROA of 1.192% at the Bank level exceeded the target ROA of 1.00% which is equivalent to a 132.0% payout of the incentive. Based on a 132.0% payout, 39.6% of base salary is to be paid to the CEO and 26.4% of base salary is to be paid to the remaining executive officers. The percentage of base salary for this 2017 incentive is paid in the first quarter 2018.of the subsequent year. The target percentage along with budget and base may be adjusted for 2018.2024.

35

The second criterion used in determining the cash incentive to be paid to executive officers is earnings per share (“EPS”) of the Company. The target EPS goal is based on reviewing past performance and history and the projected EPS from the budget. Based on the Company’s two-for-one stock split on September 20, 2017, theThe EPS final incentive target ranges were adjusted on a split basisset as follows: a 5% incentive would be paid for an EPS of $0.925,$2.46, a 10% incentive would be paid for an EPS of $1.05,$2.51, and a 15% incentive would be paid for an EPS of $1.175.$2.66. If the EPS is below $0.925,$2.46, an incentive would not be paid for this criterion. An EPS in between the stated targets or exceeding $1.175$2.66 would be adjusted accordingly. Under this criterion, a split adjusted EPS of $1.26 was used for the projected 2017 incentive. An EPS of $1.375 resulted in a prorated payout of 148.7% of total goal which is equivalent to 23.0% of base salary paid to all executive officers. The percentage of base salary for the 2017 incentive is paid in the first quarter 2018.of the subsequent year. The target EPS and corresponding percentages may be adjusted for 2018.2024.

The budget or forecast ROA and EPS used for the 20172023 incentives were set equivalent to the expected performance of normal operations.

In establishing dual incentives for the executive officers of the Bank, the objective of the Company is to limit the risk exposure to compensating for short term gains while still recognizing the importance of return to its shareholders each year. Thus, more emphasis is placed on rewarding for stable, long termlong-term performance through the use of ROA criterion along with a higher percentage of pay at risk. The EPS criterion recognizes a yearly target and focuses on the importance of earning performance and its impact on maintaining a healthy profitable corporation from which to pay dividends to shareholders and to maintain and improve the value of their stock. Each year, the committeeCommittee sets goals for each incentive which it believes are attainable, but still require executives’ performance at a consistently

27

high level to achieve target award levels. As such, the Company believes it has established an equitable and reasonable balance in the incentives for executive management. Given that the target ROA and EPS may be adjusted each year at the Board’s discretion, the Company feels it has established a plan that is beneficial to both its executives and shareholders by placing overall emphasis on corporate performance and return to shareholders.

Further discussion of the Bank’s overall incentive plan may be found in the 20172023 financial report and the Form 10-K.

Incentive Stock Compensation. The Bank uses the grant of stock awards under our Long TermLong-Term Incentive Plan as the primary vehicle for providing long-term incentive compensation opportunities to its officers, including the Named Executive Officers. The grant of stock awards is intended to serve as both a recruitment tool, as well as an officer retention and recruitment tool and to reward performance, and as such requires a three-year cliff vesting period prior to issuance without restrictions. Officers’ and Named Executive Officers’ past and future services are considered for grants of stock awards. The Bank has not adopted any specific policy regarding the amount or timing of any stock-based compensation under the plan. The number of shares underlying the award granted to each Named Executive Officer in 20172023 is set forth in the Grants of Plan Based Awards Table and the fair value dollar amount, determined on the grant date, for calendar year 2015, 2016,years 2021, 2022 and 20172023 with respect to each such award is set forth in the column titled Stock Awards of the Summary Compensation Table, each of which follows. Information concerning the number of stock awards held by each Named Executive Officer as of December 31, 20172023 is set forth in the Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-end Table, which also follows.

Profit Sharing PlanPlan.. The Bank has established a 401(k) profit sharing plan that allows eligible employees to save at a minimum one percent of eligible compensation on a pre-tax or post-tax basis, subject to certain Internal Revenue Service limitations. The Bank will match 50% of employee 401(k) contributions up to foursix percent of total eligible compensation. In addition, the Bank may make a discretionary contribution from time to time as is deemed advisable. A participant is 100% vested in the participant’s deferral contributions. A six-year vesting schedule applies to employerEmployer matching contributions are funded each pay cycle and are immediately vested. Employer discretionary contributions are immediately vested. Employees are immediately eligible upon hire to contribute to the plan and employeereceive matching contributions. In order to be eligible to participate, the employeefor discretionary contributions, employees must be 21 years of age, have completed six months of service, work 1,000 hours in the plan year and be employed on the last day of the year. Entry dates have been established at January 1 and July 1 of each year. The plan calls for only lump-sum distributions upon either termination of employment, retirement, death, or disability. The Company’s contribution to the plan made on behalf of the Named Executive Officers is included under the “All Other Compensation” column in the Summary Compensation Table.

36

Health and Welfare Benefits. The Company provides healthcare, life and disability insurance and other employee welfare benefits programs to its employees, including its executive officers. The committee is responsibleprovides guidance for overseeing the administration of these programs and believes that its employee benefits programs should be comparable to those maintained by other members of the relevant peer groups so as to assure that the Company is able to maintain a competitive position in terms of attracting and retaining officers and other employees. Except for our Executive Survivor Income Agreement, our employee benefits plans are provided on a non-discriminatory basis to all employees.

The Company has entered into Executive Survivor Income Agreements with some of the Named Executive Officers that provide certain death benefits to the executive’s beneficiaries upon his or her death. The agreements provide a pre-retirement and post-retirement death benefit payable to the beneficiaries of the executive in the event of the executive’s death. The Company had originally purchased life insurance policies on the lives of all participants covered by these agreements in amounts sufficient to provide the sums necessary to pay the beneficiaries. As the employees age and their pay increased,changes, the Company is made whole on its investment before beneficiaries receive any proceeds. Therefore, over time, the death benefit payable to the beneficiary may be smaller than the previously anticipated value. OneTwo former executive and one current Named Executive Officertwo active executives have been impacted. The actual gross death benefit amounts payable under this plan are disclosed under Payments and Benefits in Connection with Termination or Change-in-Control.

28

Consideration of Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation. The Company again conducted an advisory vote on executive compensation.compensation at the 2023 annual Meeting of Shareholders. Votes cast on that advisory proposal indicated a significant level of support in favor of the Company’s compensation policies and practices as disclosed in the proxy statement for the 20172023 Annual Meeting. Results were favorably comparable to the previous advisory vote on executive compensation which was conducted at the Company’s 2014 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. As a result of this strong shareholder support, the Boardboard of Directorsdirectors and the Committee did not believe that any significant changes to the Company’s compensation policies and practices were needed to address shareholder concerns.

Consideration on FrequencyAt the 2023 Annual Meeting of Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation. TheShareholders, the Company also conducted its secondlast advisory vote on the frequency with which shareholders of the company should vote onwould be asked to endorse the executive compensation program. VotesA majority of votes cast on thethis advisory proposal were again in favor of holding future advisory votes on the Company’s executive compensation program at a frequency of every three years.year. Based on the votingadvisory vote results the Board of Directors and the Committee did not believe any changes were needed toregarding the frequency with which shareholders of the company would be asked to endorse the executive compensation program.program, the Board of Directors and Committee elected to hold the advisory vote on executive compensation annually.

Shareholders again have an opportunity to express their opinion and cast their advisory votes in consideration of the Company’s executive compensation program at this year’s Annual Meeting. The Board of Directors and Committee will evaluate the results of this year’s advisory vote to determine whether changes to such policies and practices may be necessary or appropriate to address shareholder concerns.

20172023 Executive Officer Compensation Program. For 2017,2023, the Named Executive Officers in the Summary Compensation Table received salaries that were intended to maintain their compensation at a competitive level and acknowledge the competitive market conditions in which the Bank’s business continues to be conducted.

To aid in determining chief executive officer compensation for 2017,2023, the Company used compensation data from peer bank holding companies which are similar in size ($628.8 million1.045 billion to $2.36$4.998 billion in assets), and geographic locations (located in(in Ohio, Indiana, Michigan, and Michigan), andPennsylvania) of which the majority are also publicly held and performing similarly to the Company as one piece of information. Data is obtained from the proxy statements filed by those companies as of the previous year end.end and through consultation with an independent executive compensation advisor. This provided a regional comparison in addition to compensation data obtained from other state or national peer comparisons.

For 20172023 executive officer compensation, the President and CEO of the Bank, the Chief People Officer (CPO) and the CFO, participated in the presentation portion of the Committee meeting at which compensation information was presented and reviewed. The committeeCommittee then met in executive session and made its own determinations regarding compensation for the President and CEO and all other executive officers. Adjustments in 20172023 base salary were based upon each Named Executive Officer’s annual performance

37

review, an annual review of peer compensation, and the overall performance of the Company. These adjustments are consistent with the Company’s salary budget which is approved by the Compensation Committee and becomes part of the overall budget approved annually by the Board of Directors.

As part of its compensation program the Company has entered into agreements with some of the Named Executive Officers pursuant to which they will be entitled to receive severance benefits upon the occurrence of certain enumerated events following a change in control. The events that trigger payment are generally those related to termination of employment without cause or detrimental changes in the executive’s terms and conditions of employment. See Employment Contracts and Payments Upon Termination of “Changethe section captioned “Post-Employment Compensation/Change in Control”Control Agreements” that follows for a more detailed description of these events. The Company believes that this structure will help: (i) assure the executives’ full attention and dedication to the Company, free from distractions caused by personal uncertainties and risks related to a pending or threatened change in control, (ii) assure the executives’ objectivity for shareholders’ interests, (iii) assure the executives of fair treatment in case of involuntary termination following a change in control, and (iv) attract and retain key talent during uncertain times.

Risk Management and Compensation. The compensation policies and practices of the Company are not believed to create risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on operations or financial results. The compensation policies and practices of the Company are not designed to provide enormous bonuses and do not encourage employees to take undue amounts of risk. The incentives provided to employees are designed to encourage sound performance over time rather than the pursuit of immediate high-risk profits. The policies and practices of the Company include controls that mitigate the potential impact of compensation policies that might otherwise create unacceptable levels of risk.

2938

Summary Compensation Table

Summary Compensation Table Footnotes:

Table for Footnote⁽³⁾

3039

Narrative Explanation to the Summary Compensation table

Named Executive Officers participate in an annual cash-based incentive compensation program that provides for awards tied to the profit performance of the Company during the fiscal year. The amounts set forth in the “Non-Equity“Non-Equity Incentive Compensation” column represent the awards made under the terms of the Plan for 20172023 which will bewere paid to the respective Named Executive Officer during the first quarter of 2018.2024. The awards under the plan in 20152022 and 20162023 were also paid out to officers in the first quarter of the following year. Refer to the compensation discussion and analysis for a complete explanation of the Plan.

The stock awards reported in the Summary Compensation Table represent the dollar amount valued as of the grant date of restricted stock awards to Named Executive Officers. The vesting of all of the awards of restricted stock made to date under the terms of the Long TermLong-Term Incentive Plan occurs three years following the grant.grant, unless otherwise specified.

Outstanding Equity Awards at 2017 Fiscal Year-End Table